Guide

Multi-hood systems: how vendors should price

Updated 2026-09-12

Three bids for a hotel banquet kitchen or commissary often look incomparable: one lump sum, one “per hood,” one that quietly omits a shared riser. The number is useless until every quote names the same hoods, fans, duct segments, and access assumptions. This page is about quote structure — not a price list. Vendor-published dollar bands exist online; treat them as regional Unknown until three local bids match the same written scope.

Short answer Demand a written system map: hood count, which fan serves which hood, shared vs dedicated duct, and full path (hood → plenum → duct → fan → grease path) for every line. Prefer flat per-visit pricing with component line items (or hybrid categories) over vague lumps or hourly clocks for recurring work. Shared ducts/fans need one named owner of the common run and a cadence set to the greasiest tenant. Access, height, missing panels, and after-hours windows must be itemized or explicitly assumed — not sprung on the roof. Compare three quotes on one sheet. Not legal advice.

Quote formats that actually compare

FormatWhat you getOperator risk
Lump sum onlyOne total for “hood cleaning”Cannot tell if duct/fan/shared riser are in; hard to rebid when one hood changes
Per-hood flatSame unit price × hood countUndervalues long shared ducts / hard fans; overprices identical short runs if not adjusted
Per-system (hood + its duct + its fan)One price per exhaust pathBest default when each hood has its own fan; fails if paths merge without a shared-run line
Hybrid: categories + totalHoods / ducts / fans / extras as headings, one visit totalUsually the fairest apples-to-apples sheet for hotels and multi-line kitchens
Hourly crewClock starts on arrivalSecondary cost guides: fine for odd one-offs; weak for recurring budgets — crew has no incentive to finish

What must appear on the quote sheet

Comparable multi-hood bid

  • Same hood/fan list as the other two bids
  • Shared duct/fan either in every bid or clearly out of all three
  • Asks about roof access, panel locations, grease load history
  • Photos + report + label named in the price

Apples-to-oranges bid

  • “Clean all hoods” with no hood count or fan count
  • Per-hood price that never mentions the common riser
  • Low lump that matches a canopy wipe, not a full path
  • Extras (night premium, panel cuts, hard roof) revealed only on site

Shared duct / shared fan complications

Field note — who owns the common run

Drivers that move multi-hood totals (structure, not dollars)

DriverWhy it shows up on multi-hood jobsRelated guide
Hood + fan countSecondary cost pages scale bands by hood count and flag 10+ hoods as customQuote checklist
System complexityBranching ducts, multiple fans, long horizontals, tight bends = more labor per visitFull-system vs canopy-only
Missing access panelsCannot clean what cannot be opened; panel installs are often change ordersMissing duct access panels
Rooftop / height accessHard roofs, no hinge kits, freight elevators, multi-story risersRooftop fan access
After-hours windowBanquet and 24-hour kitchens often need night crews; premium should be line-itemedAfter-hours premiums
Grease load / overdueFirst deep clean after neglect is not the same job as a maintained quarterlyInspection frequency

Vendor-published ranges (regional Unknown)

Secondary 2026 vendor education pages publish multi-hood / multi-system bands (examples: per-visit tables scaled by hood count; “large or complex / hotel-hospital” custom tiers). Those figures are market illustrations from specific regions and vendors — not national facts and not quotes for your kitchen. Mark any number you see online as regional Unknown until three local contractors price the same written system map. Do not use a blog table to reject a compliant full-path bid or to accept a canopy-only lowball.

Who it’s for / not for

Sources