Guide

Suppression system vs hood cleaning — who does which job

Updated 2026-09-14

Two different systems share the same hood canopy. Grease exhaust cleaning keeps fuel (grease) from accumulating in the path. The automatic wet-chemical extinguishing system puts out a cook-line fire when one starts. Fire marshals and insurers check both. One sticker does not cover the other. This page is the operator split — who to call, what cadence to expect, what belongs in which binder tab. Not legal advice; confirm the editions your AHJ adopted.

Short answer Grease exhaust inspection/cleaning follows NFPA 96 (KEC path): trained/qualified/certified cleaners, cadence driven by cooking volume, cleaning when grease exceeds depth limits. Automatic wet-chem / UL 300 system ITM follows NFPA 17A (and related NFPA 96 suppression references): licensed fire-protection contractors, commonly semiannual secondary, fusible links replaced on that service — not a hood-cleaner job. After a clean, nozzles and detection components must be correctly restored and the system rearmed; many kitchens need the suppression contractor to verify or reset after the cleaner. Keep separate binder tabs. Intervals below are secondary summaries — your AHJ wins.

Side-by-side job chart

ItemHood / grease exhaust cleaningWet-chem suppression ITM
Governing standard (secondary)NFPA 96 — ventilation / grease removal / cleaning docsNFPA 17A — wet chemical system design, install, ITM; UL 300 listing for the hardware
What gets workedHood, filters, plenum, ducts, fan, rooftop grease pathAgent cylinder, piping, nozzles/caps, detection line, fusible links, manual pull, fuel shutoff, alarm interlocks
Typical cadence (secondary)Inspection by volume (solid monthly / high quarterly / moderate semiannual / low annual); clean when grease over limitsProfessional service commonly every six months; owner/agent monthly visual between visits
Who does itKitchen exhaust cleaner acceptable to the AHJLicensed / factory-trained fire-protection technician
Proof you keepHood service label + written inspection/cleaning reports + photosSystem service tag + semiannual ITM reports + fusible-link dates

Who owns which parts

After a hood clean: who resets nozzles?

Field note — the handoff gap

Clear split done right

  • Two contractors (or one firm with both licenses) on the calendar
  • Grease reports and suppression reports in separate binder tabs
  • Written note after every clean: “system restored / verified by ___ on ___”
  • Equipment moves trigger a suppression coverage check before the next busy Friday

Common mix-ups

  • “Suppression was just done — we don’t need a duct clean”
  • “The cleaner put a sticker on — fusible links are fine”
  • Nozzles left uncapped or aimed at empty floor space after a remodel
  • One binder pile where nobody can find the six-month tag

Binder tabs (keep them separate)

TabWhat goes hereWho updates it
Grease / exhaustCleaning + inspection reports, inaccessible-area lists, before/after photos, invoices, schedule by cooking volumeKEC / hood cleaner
Suppression ITMSemiannual service reports, fusible-link replacement dates, cylinder/hydro notes, recharge records after any dischargeFire-protection contractor
On the equipmentHood service label; suppression cylinder/system tag; Class K / extinguisher tagsRespective vendors + your monthly visual checks

Secondary marshal-facing checklists often ask for the last two suppression reports plus the most recent cleaning certificate in the same visit — separate tabs, one binder.

Why one vendor rarely covers both

Who it’s for / not for

Sources